Stroker or no stroker. - Team-2G Mitsubishi Forum

Silk90 · 09-10-2006, 09:06 PM

pretty simple. i need to go forged and what not im wondering Should i go 2.4 stroker? would be going eagle rod's and wiesco piston's post any comment's or suggestion's on that aswell if u like but my main concern is weather or not to go stroker while I'm down there..

eder-loco · 09-10-2006, 09:34 PM

get a supra

Silk90 · 09-10-2006, 10:14 PM

i didn't know that was an option. i sure as hell learned something lol. as much as id love a supra i got too much **** done to just stop.....

Jasons97GSX · 09-10-2006, 10:17 PM

shep and rau both run 2.0l why shouldnt you?

Arrogance · 09-11-2006, 02:07 AM

You would have to get a 2.4l block, and crank ..

but if you want to spend that much money .. Go for it.

There's no replacement for displacement.

droptop · 09-11-2006, 02:31 AM

depends what u want it for u'll get more torque outta the stroker but u dont rev as high most ur power will be mid ranged- good for street, auto cross. read this for ur options.....there is always the long rod option u get the displacement and keep the revs

http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49472

DSM_ South West · 09-11-2006, 12:59 PM

I don't think he needs a 2.1 destroker. Not very many of us have a need for it.

AWDspyder · 09-12-2006, 02:12 AM

Strock it all the way

2.3L
Wiesco 8.8:1
Eagle Rods

Silk90 · 09-12-2006, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AWDspyder

Strock it all the way

2.3L
Wiesco 8.8:1
Eagle Rods

The way i was thinking of it was, i gotta go forged so thats what 800ish anyways? well why not gain almost 25% more displacement over stock for say 1100 from slowboy.... i havent made my decision yet but i got a few more months to go.

Blageo23 · 09-12-2006, 11:48 PM

Just an FYI 2.3L is the stroker and the 2.4L is just a 2.4L. Cost of build up for each is about the same. The pistons and rods that you are going to need to get are the same price. All thats different is that you will need to buy a block and crank. I picked one up for $75 at a local junk yard. Plus the 2.4 will give you better low end torque. Im going with the 2.4 because its just better.

Arrogance · 09-13-2006, 01:41 PM

The 2.4L block and crack is going to cost you more than $75 unless you're extrememly lucky.

AWDspyder · 09-15-2006, 04:43 PM

i just don't like the 4g64's chances of walking as well.

DSMtsi · 09-15-2006, 09:21 PM

I like reving to 9000 rpm. Stick with a 2.0

Silk90 · 09-15-2006, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSMtsi

I like reving to 9000 rpm. Stick with a 2.0

ive never went past 8k in the whole life of my car. still undecided but will prolly stick with the 2.0, currently re-working the head after OWNING the old one

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blageo23

the 2.4 will give you better low end torque. Im going with the 2.4 because its just better.

IMO low end torque + FWD = Bad new's , just a thought.

AWDspyder · 09-16-2006, 09:58 PM

I rev to 8k on my 2.3L....... High rev's puts a hell of a lot of stress on the tranny and the entire driveline.

View Poll Results: Go stroker?
Stroker 2.4	8	61.54%
Keep it 2.0	5	38.46%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

09-10-2006, 09:06 PM	#1
Silk90 Honda Eater Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Clermont , FL Posts: 917	Stroker or no stroker. pretty simple. i need to go forged and what not im wondering Should i go 2.4 stroker? would be going eagle rod's and wiesco piston's post any comment's or suggestion's on that aswell if u like but my main concern is weather or not to go stroker while I'm down there.. __________________ Zac O. 2000 Dakota 5.9L 4x4 (The Hauler) 2007 Yamaha R6 320WHP 98GST Sold Utterly Built 95 talon AWD Sold 2000 Audi S4 *Sold

09-10-2006, 10:14 PM	#3
Silk90 Honda Eater Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Clermont , FL Posts: 917	i didn't know that was an option. i sure as hell learned something lol. as much as id love a supra i got too much **** done to just stop..... __________________ Zac O. 2000 Dakota 5.9L 4x4 (The Hauler) 2007 Yamaha R6 320WHP 98GST Sold Utterly Built 95 talon AWD Sold 2000 Audi S4 *Sold

09-10-2006, 10:17 PM	#4
Jasons97GSX Lambo Hunter Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Nazareth, PA Posts: 1,366	shep and rau both run 2.0l why shouldnt you? __________________ 97GSX Slush Box 6bolted

09-11-2006, 02:07 AM	#5
Arrogance Lambo Hunter Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: In the garage Posts: 1,794	You would have to get a 2.4l block, and crank .. but if you want to spend that much money .. Go for it. There's no replacement for displacement. __________________ The Purity of the DSM resides here. The Rides

09-10-2006, 09:34 PM	#2
eder-loco Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Houston,Tx Posts: 152	get a supra

09-11-2006, 02:31 AM	#6
droptop Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: portland oregon Posts: 122	depends what u want it for u'll get more torque outta the stroker but u dont rev as high most ur power will be mid ranged- good for street, auto cross. read this for ur options.....there is always the long rod option u get the displacement and keep the revs http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49472

09-12-2006, 02:12 AM	#8
AWDspyder Post-Fiend Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Lil' Rhody Posts: 2,453	Strock it all the way 2.3L Wiesco 8.8:1 Eagle Rods __________________ 1991 Talon AWD....Don't be scurred "There is only one holiday that means anything and you are to make the holy pilgrimmage to Norwalk for it every year." - Driggs

09-12-2006, 11:48 PM	#10
Blageo23 Turbo Tech Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Shoreview Posts: 292	Just an FYI 2.3L is the stroker and the 2.4L is just a 2.4L. Cost of build up for each is about the same. The pistons and rods that you are going to need to get are the same price. All thats different is that you will need to buy a block and crank. I picked one up for $75 at a local junk yard. Plus the 2.4 will give you better low end torque. Im going with the 2.4 because its just better.

09-13-2006, 01:41 PM	#11
Arrogance Lambo Hunter Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: In the garage Posts: 1,794	The 2.4L block and crack is going to cost you more than $75 unless you're extrememly lucky. __________________ The Purity of the DSM resides here. The Rides

09-15-2006, 04:43 PM	#12
AWDspyder Post-Fiend Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Lil' Rhody Posts: 2,453	i just don't like the 4g64's chances of walking as well. __________________ 1991 Talon AWD....Don't be scurred "There is only one holiday that means anything and you are to make the holy pilgrimmage to Norwalk for it every year." - Driggs

09-15-2006, 09:21 PM	#13
DSMtsi Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Iowa Posts: 97	I like reving to 9000 rpm. Stick with a 2.0 __________________

09-16-2006, 09:58 PM	#15
AWDspyder Post-Fiend Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Lil' Rhody Posts: 2,453	I rev to 8k on my 2.3L....... High rev's puts a hell of a lot of stress on the tranny and the entire driveline. __________________ 1991 Talon AWD....Don't be scurred "There is only one holiday that means anything and you are to make the holy pilgrimmage to Norwalk for it every year." - Driggs

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
stroker	talon86	Performance Engine/Bolt-ons	2	11-22-2005 02:09 AM
My stroker and tranny build	Sykotic	Drivetrain	6	11-21-2005 01:05 PM
2Gb TSi AWD 2.4L Stroker	i r teh winnar	Off Topic	0	10-12-2005 09:43 PM
Stroker kit	Draggo42684	Performance Engine/Bolt-ons	6	09-02-2005 10:03 PM
2.4 Stroker Compression	Trub00gie	Performance Engine/Bolt-ons	8	05-10-2005 12:16 AM